🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.