🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam order, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to employ a newly configured congressional map that could add up to five new Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 decision, released on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to lift a lower court's injunction that had rejected the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disrupting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its action.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably sorted voters based on their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to revert to the maps created after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Strong Opposition

In a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's decision. She contended that it disregarded the work of the lower court, pointing out that its opinion was actually authored by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its increased political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a violation of the constitution.

National Redistricting Struggle

This decision occurs during a national battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican control. Typically, redistricting occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that might create a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, for their part, have responded with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas AG hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes supportive of the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

In contrast, Democratic representatives decried the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

A leading House leader said the court had once again eroded its standing by approving a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.